PAIN
Volume 108, Issue 1 , Pages 154-162, March 2004

Development of and recovery from long-term pain. A 6-year follow-up study of a cross-section of the adult Danish population

  • Jørgen Eriksen

      Affiliations

    • Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, H:S Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Dept. 7612, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. Tel.: +45-354-57-382; fax: +45-354-57-349
  • ,
  • Ola Ekholm

      Affiliations

    • National Institute of Public Health, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • ,
  • Per Sjøgren

      Affiliations

    • Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, H:S Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • ,
  • Niels K Rasmussen

      Affiliations

    • National Institute of Public Health, Copenhagen, Denmark

Received 21 August 2003; received in revised form 4 December 2003; accepted 15 December 2003.

AIB-16268

Abstract 

A 6-year follow-up study of a cross-section of the adult Danish population, based on data from the Danish Health and Morbidity Surveys in 1994 and 2000 is presented. The pain populations were identified through the pain intensity verbal rating scale (VRS) included in the Short Form 36. The 2000 survey also included a question on duration of pain (>6 months). Using this as the ‘gold standard’, a validation study was performed, which identified the highest accuracy (85%) at the VRS cut-off level: no pain, very mild, or mild pain (control group) versus moderate, severe, or very severe pain (pain group). The cohort comprised 2649 individuals, representative of the Danish population. Prevalence rates of pain in 1994 and 2000 were 13.5 and 15.7%, respectively. The cumulated 6-year incidence of pain development was 10.7%, and the cumulated incidence of pain recovery was 52.1%. During the investigated period, 9.2% of individuals moved from a ‘no pain status’ to a ‘pain status’, 7% moved from a ‘pain status’ to a ‘no pain status’, and 6.5% maintained their ‘pain status’. Significant risk factors for pain development were female gender [odds ratio (OR) 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–2.0], short education (OR 1.5, CI 1.0–2.2), poor self-rated health (OR 3.3, CI 2.4–4.7), and having at least one long-standing disease (OR 2.6, CI 2.0–3.4). Significant predictors for pain recovery were male gender, younger age, cohabitation status, good self-rated health, good mental health, having no long-standing disease, and having an annual income above US$ 15 400.

Keywords:  Cohort study, Pain development, Pain recovery, Risk factors

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0304-3959(03)00500-1

doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.018

PAIN
Volume 108, Issue 1 , Pages 154-162, March 2004