PAIN
Volume 118, Issue 1 , Pages 43-52, November 2005

Motor cortex stimulation for refractory neuropathic pain: Four year outcome and predictors of efficacy

  • Christophe Nuti

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, CHU Saint-Etienne, Bd Pasteur, 42055 Saint-Etienne cedex 2, France
    • INSERM EMI 0342, UCBLyon1 & UJM Saint-Etienne, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Corresponding author. Address: Department of Neurosurgery, CHU Saint-Etienne, Bd Pasteur, 42055 Saint-Etienne cedex 2, France. Tel.: +33 477 127 723; fax: +33 477 120 544.
  • ,
  • Roland Peyron

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology & Pain center, CHU Saint-Etienne, Bd Pasteur, 42055 Saint-Etienne cedex 2, France
    • INSERM EMI 0342, UCBLyon1 & UJM Saint-Etienne, France
  • ,
  • Luis Garcia-Larrea

      Affiliations

    • INSERM EMI 0342, UCBLyon1 & UJM Saint-Etienne, France
  • ,
  • Jacques Brunon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, CHU Saint-Etienne, Bd Pasteur, 42055 Saint-Etienne cedex 2, France
  • ,
  • Bernard Laurent

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology & Pain center, CHU Saint-Etienne, Bd Pasteur, 42055 Saint-Etienne cedex 2, France
    • INSERM EMI 0342, UCBLyon1 & UJM Saint-Etienne, France
  • ,
  • Marc Sindou

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery A, CHU Lyon, France
  • ,
  • Patrick Mertens

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery A, CHU Lyon, France
    • INSERM EMI 0342, UCBLyon1 & UJM Saint-Etienne, France

Received 28 September 2004; received in revised form 11 July 2005; accepted 25 July 2005.

Abstract 

Thirty-one patients with medically refractory neuropathic pain were included in a prospective evaluation of motor cortex stimulation. The long-term outcome was evaluated using five variables: (a) rate (percentage) of pain relief, (b) pain scores as assessed on VAS, (c) postoperative decrease in VAS scores, (d) reduction in analgesic drug intake, (e) a dichotomic (yes/no) response to the question whether the patient would accept, under similar circumstances, to be operated on again. Pain relief was rated as excellent (>70 % pain relief) in 10 % of cases, good (40-69 %) in 42 %, poor (10-39 %) in 35 % and negligible (0-9 %) in 13 %. Intake of analgesic drugs was decreased in 52 % of patients and unchanged in 45 % (unavailable data in 3 %), with complete withdrawal of analgesic drugs in 36 % of patients. Twenty-one patients (70 %) declared themselves favourable to re-intervention if the same beneficial outcome could be guaranteed. Neither preoperative motor status, pain characteristics, type or localisation of lesions, quantitative sensory testing, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials, nor the interval between pain and surgery were found to predict the efficacy of MCS. The level of pain relief, as evaluated in the first month following implantation was a strong predictor of long-term relief (regression analysis, R=0.744; p<0.0001). These results confirm that MCS can be a satisfactory and durable alternative to medical treatments in patients with refractory pain, and suggest that the efficacy of MCS may be predicted in the first month of therapy.

Keywords: Brain stimulation, Motor cortex, Chronic pain, Central pain, Analgesia

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0304-3959(05)00380-5

doi:10.1016/j.pain.2005.07.020

PAIN
Volume 118, Issue 1 , Pages 43-52, November 2005