PAIN
Volume 137, Issue 3 , Pages 600-608, 31 July 2008

Tactile discrimination, but not tactile stimulation alone, reduces chronic limb pain

  • G. Lorimer Moseley

      Affiliations

    • Pain Imaging Neuroscience Group, Department of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, Le Gros Clark Building, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QX, UK
    • FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Pain Imaging Neuroscience Group, Department of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, Le Gros Clark Building, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QX, UK. Tel.: +44 (0) 1865 282658; fax: +44 (0) 1865 282656.
  • ,
  • Nadia M. Zalucki

      Affiliations

    • School of Physiotherapy, The University of Sydney, Australia
    • Department of Physiotherapy, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, Australia
  • ,
  • Katja Wiech

      Affiliations

    • FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, UK

Received 28 June 2007; received in revised form 11 October 2007; accepted 22 October 2007. published online 03 December 2007.

Abstract 

Chronic pain is often associated with reduced tactile acuity. A relationship exists between pain intensity, tactile acuity and cortical reorganisation. When pain resolves, tactile function improves and cortical organisation normalises. Tactile acuity can be improved in healthy controls when tactile stimulation is associated with a behavioural objective. We hypothesised that, in patients with chronic limb pain and decreased tactile acuity, discriminating between tactile stimuli would decrease pain and increase tactile acuity, but tactile stimulation alone would not. Thirteen patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) of one limb underwent a waiting period and then ∼2 weeks of tactile stimulation under two conditions: stimulation alone or discrimination between stimuli according to their diameter and location. There was no change in pain (100mm VAS) or two-point discrimination (TPD) during a no-treatment waiting period, nor during the stimulation phase (p>0.32 for both). Pain and TPD were lower after the discrimination phase [mean (95% CI) effect size for pain VAS=27mm (14–40mm) and for TPD=5.7mm (2.9–8.5mm), p<0.015 for both]. These gains were maintained at three-month follow-up. We conclude that tactile stimulation can decrease pain and increase tactile acuity when patients are required to discriminate between the type and location of tactile stimuli.

Keywords: Tactile acuity, Sensation, Physical therapy, Complex regional pain syndrome, Cortical reorganisation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0304-3959(07)00631-8

doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.021

PAIN
Volume 137, Issue 3 , Pages 600-608, 31 July 2008