PAIN
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 260-266, 15 October 2008

Stimulation of myofascial trigger points with ultrasound induces segmental antinociceptive effects: A randomized controlled study

  • John Z. Srbely

      Affiliations

    • Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada N1G 2W1
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 519 824 4120x56751; fax: +1 519 763 5902.
  • ,
  • James P. Dickey

      Affiliations

    • Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada N1G 2W1
  • ,
  • Mark Lowerison

      Affiliations

    • Centre for the Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada N1G 2W1
  • ,
  • A. Michelle Edwards

      Affiliations

    • Academic Services, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada N1G 2W1
  • ,
  • Paul S. Nolet

      Affiliations

    • Church Lane Rehabilitation Clinic, Guelph, Ont., Canada N1H 2W6
  • ,
  • Leonard L. Wong

      Affiliations

    • Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada N1G 2W1

Received 6 December 2006; received in revised form 28 March 2008; accepted 15 April 2008. published online 28 May 2008.

Abstract 

Musculoskeletal pain affects a significant proportion of the general population. The myofascial trigger point is recognized as a key factor in the pathophysiology of musculoskeletal pain. Ultrasound is commonly employed in the treatment and management of soft tissue pain and, in this study, we set out to investigate the segmental antinociceptive effect of ultrasound. Subjects (n=50) with identifiable myofascial trigger points in the supraspinatus, infraspinatus and gluteus medius muscles were selected from an outpatient rehabilitation clinic and randomly assigned to test or control groups. Test subjects received a therapeutic dose of ultrasound to the right supraspinatus trigger point while control groups received a sham (null) exposure. Baseline pain pressure threshold (PPT) readings were recorded at the ipsilateral infraspinatus and gluteus medius trigger-point sites prior to ultrasound exposure. The infraspinatus point was chosen due to its segmental neurologic link with the supraspinatus point; the gluteus medius acted as a segmental control point. Following the ultrasound intervention, PPT readings were recorded at 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15min intervals at both infraspinatus and gluteus medius trigger points; the difference between infraspinatus and gluteus medius PPT values, PPTseg, represents the segmental influence on the PPT. The ultrasound test group demonstrated statistically significant increases in PPTseg (decreased infraspinatus sensitivity) at 1, 3 and 5min, when compared with PPTseg in the sham ultrasound group. These results establish that low-dose ultrasound evokes short-term segmental antinociceptive effects on trigger points which may have applications in the management of musculoskeletal pain.

Keywords: Trigger point, Ultrasound, Myofascial pain, Segmental pain, Antinociception, Musculoskeletal pain

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0304-3959(08)00197-8

doi:10.1016/j.pain.2008.04.009

PAIN
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 260-266, 15 October 2008