PAIN
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 306-314, 15 October 2008

Learning potentiates neurophysiological and behavioral placebo analgesic responses

  • Luana Colloca

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin Medical School, and National Institute of Neuroscience, Turin, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Università di Torino, Corso Raffello 30, 10125 Turin, Italy. Tel.: +39 011 6707701; fax: +39 011 6708174.
    • These authors have equally contributed.
  • ,
  • Michele Tinazzi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vision and Neurological Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
    • These authors have equally contributed.
  • ,
  • Serena Recchia

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vision and Neurological Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
  • ,
  • Domenica Le Pera

      Affiliations

    • Motor Rehabilitation, IRCSS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • Antonio Fiaschi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vision and Neurological Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
  • ,
  • Fabrizio Benedetti

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin Medical School, and National Institute of Neuroscience, Turin, Italy
  • ,
  • Massimiliano Valeriani

      Affiliations

    • Division of Neurology, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, IRCCS, Rome, Italy

Received 7 December 2007; received in revised form 21 April 2008; accepted 24 April 2008. published online 09 June 2008.

Abstract 

Expectation and conditioning are supposed to be the two main psychological mechanisms for inducing a placebo response. Here, we further investigate the effects of both expectation, which was induced by verbal suggestion alone, and conditioning at the level of N1 and N2–P2 components of CO2 laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) and subjective pain reports. Forty-four healthy volunteers were pseudorandomly assigned to one of three experimental groups: Group 1 was tested with verbal suggestion alone, Group 2 was tested with a conditioning procedure, whereby the intensity of painful stimulation was reduced surreptitiously, so as to make the volunteers believe that the treatment was effective, Group 3 was a control group that allowed us to rule out phenomena of sensitization and/or habituation. Pain perception was assessed according to a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0=no pain sensation to 10=maximum imaginable pain. Both verbal suggestions (Group 1) and conditioning (Group 2) modified the N2–P2 complex, but not the N1 component of LEPs. However, the suggestion-induced LEP changes occurred without subjective perception of pain decrease. Conversely, the N2–P2 amplitude changes that were induced by the conditioning procedure were associated with the subjective perception of pain reduction. Compared to natural history, conditioning produced more robust reductions of LEP amplitudes than verbal suggestions alone. Overall, these findings indicate that prior positive experience plays a key role in maximizing both behavioral and neurophysiological placebo responses, emphasizing that the placebo effect is a learning phenomenon which affects the early central nociceptive processing.

Keywords: Learning, Placebo analgesia, Laser-evoked potentials, Expectation, Conditioning

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0304-3959(08)00230-3

doi:10.1016/j.pain.2008.04.021

PAIN
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 306-314, 15 October 2008