PAIN
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 333-341, 15 October 2008

Somatosensory abnormalities in atypical odontalgia: A case-control study

  • Thomas List

      Affiliations

    • Orofacial Pain Unit, Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Carl Gustavsv. 34, SE-20506 Malmö, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +46 406658424; fax: +46 406658420.
  • ,
  • Göran Leijon

      Affiliations

    • Division of Neurology, Department of Neuroscience and Locomotion, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
  • ,
  • Peter Svensson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Oral Physiology, School of Dentistry, University of Aarhus, Denmark
    • Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Received 3 July 2007; received in revised form 27 April 2008; accepted 1 May 2008. published online 20 June 2008.

Abstract 

Somatosensory function in patients with persistent idiopathic types of orofacial pain like atypical odontalgia (AO) is not well described. This study tested the hypothesis that AO patients have significantly more somatosensory abnormalities than age- and sex-matched controls. Forty-six AO patients and 35 controls participated. Inclusion criteria for AO were pain in a region where a tooth had been endodontically or surgically treated, persistent pain >6months, and lack of clinical and radiological findings. The examination included qualitative tests and a battery of intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST). Most AO patients (85%) had qualitative somatosensory abnormality compared with few controls (14%). The most common qualitative abnormalities in AO patients were found with pin-prick 67.4%, cold 47.8%, and touch 46.5% compared with 11.4%, 8.6%, and 2.9%, respectively, in the control group (P<0.001). Between-group differences were seen for many intraoral QST: mechanical detection threshold, mechanical pain threshold (pinprick), dynamic mechanical allodynia (brush), dynamic mechanical allodynia (vibration), wind-up ratio, and pressure pain threshold (P<0.01). In the trigeminal area, between-group differences in thermal thresholds were nonsignificant while differences in cold detection at the thenar eminence were significant. Individual somatosensory profiles revealed complex patterns with hyper- and hyposensitivity to intraoral QST. Between-group differences in pressure pain thresholds (P<0.02) were observed at the thenar eminence. In conclusion, significant abnormalities in intraoral somatosensory function were observed in AO, which may reflect peripheral and central sensitization of trigeminal pathways. More generalized sensitization of the nociceptive system may also be part of AO pathophysiology.

Keywords: Atypical facial pain, Neuropathic pain, Somatosensory testing, Trigeminal pain mechanisms

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0304-3959(08)00238-8

doi:10.1016/j.pain.2008.05.002

PAIN
Volume 139, Issue 2 , Pages 333-341, 15 October 2008