« Previous
Next »
PAIN
Volume 150, Issue 3
, Pages 386-389
, September 2010
“Evidence” in chronic pain – establishing best practice in the reporting of systematic reviews
References
- . Direct likelihood analysis versus simple forms of imputation for missing data in randomized clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2005;2:379–386
- . Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10:287–333
- . Randomization is important in studies with pain outcomes: systematic review of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in acute postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth. 1996;77:798–803
- . The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres?. Pain. 1997;72:95–97
- . The miracle of DICE therapy for acute stroke: fact or fictional product of subgroup analysis?. BMJ. 1994;309:1677–1681
- . Systematic review of systematic reviews of acupuncture published 1996–2005. Clin Med. 2006;6:381–386
- . Evaluation of the patient acceptable symptom state in a pooled analysis of two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies evaluating lumiracoxib and celecoxib in patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9:R11
- . Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:140–149
- . The clinical importance of changes in the 0 to 10 numeric rating scale for worst, least, and average pain intensity: analyses of data from clinical trials of duloxetine in pain disorders. J Pain. 2010;11:109–118
- . Strengths and limitations of meta-analysis: larger studies may be more reliable. Control Clin Trials. 1997;18:568–579
- . Bibliographic study showed improving methodology of meta-analyses published in leading journals 1993–2002. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:773–780
- . How do changes in pain severity levels correspond to changes in health status and function in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy?. Pain. 2010;149:194–201
- . Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e124
- . The importance of quality of primary studies in producing unbiased systematic reviews. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:661–666
- . Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:982–989
- . Identification of cutpoints for acceptable health status and important improvement in patient-reported outcomes, in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2010;37:26–31
- . Variation in the placebo effect in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: all is as blind as it seems. Pain. 1996;64:331–335
- . Enriched enrolment with randomised withdrawal (EERW): Time for a new look at clinical trial design in chronic pain. Pain. 2008;135:217–220
- Moore A, McQuay H. Bandolier’s Little Book of Making Sense of the Medical Evidence. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006 ISBN0-19-856604-2.
- . Managing potential publication bias. In: McQuay HJ, Kalso E, Moore RA editor. Systematic Reviews in Pain Research: Methodology Refined. Seattle: IASP Press; 2008;p. 15–24
- . Size is everything–large amounts of information are needed to overcome random effects in estimating direction and magnitude of treatment effects. Pain. 1998;78:209–216
- . Responder analysis for pain relief and numbers needed to treat in a meta-analysis of etoricoxib osteoarthritis trials: bridging a gap between clinical trials and clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:374–379
- Moore RA, Straube S, Derry, S, McQuay HJ. Topical review: chronic low back pain analgesic studies - a methodological minefield. Pain;2010:doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.032.
- . Fibromyalgia: moderate and substantial pain intensity reduction predicts improvement in other outcomes and substantial quality of life gain. Pain. 2010;149:360–364
- . Patient-centered perspective on treatment outcomes in chronic pain. Pain Medicine. 2010;11:6–15
- . Placebo response in neuropathic pain trials. Pain. 2008;138:479–483
- . The landscape and lexicon of blinding in randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:254–259
- . Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering. Lancet. 2002;359:614–618
- . Fixing the number of events in large comparative trials with low event rates: a binomial approach. Control Clin Trials. 1993;14:198–208
- . Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;326:472–476
- . Enriched enrollment: definition and effects of enrichment and dose in trials of pregabalin and gabapentin in neuropathic pain. A systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;66:266–275
- . Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:207–216
- . Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:79–87
- Turk, DC, Okifuji A. Pain terms and taxonomies. In Loeser D, Turk DC, Chapman CR, Butler SH. Bonica’s management of pain (3rd edition). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2001:18–25. ISBN 0683304623.
- Wetering EJ, Lemmens KM, Nieboer AP, Huijsman R. Cognitive and behavioral interventions for the management of chronic neuropathic pain in adults - A systematic review. Eur J Pain 2010; doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.11.010.
PII: S0304-3959(10)00295-2
doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.05.011
© 2010 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
PAIN
Volume 150, Issue 3
, Pages 386-389
, September 2010

