PAIN
Volume 150, Issue 3 , Pages 451-457, September 2010

The course of chronic and recurrent low back pain in the general population

  • Oezguer Tamcan

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Anne F. Mannion

      Affiliations

    • Spine Center, Schulthess Clinic, Zürich, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Claudia Eisenring

      Affiliations

    • Winterthur Institute of Health Economics WIG, Winterthur, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Bruno Horisberger

      Affiliations

    • Winterthur Institute of Health Economics WIG, Winterthur, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Achim Elfering

      Affiliations

    • Department for Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Bern, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Urs Müller

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedics, MEM Center, University of Bern, Switzerland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. IEFO, MEM Center, University of Bern, Stauffacherstrasse 78, ch-3014 Bern, Switzerland. Tel.: +41 31 631 59 42; fax: +41 31 631 59 31.

Received 27 October 2008; received in revised form 22 March 2010; accepted 20 May 2010. published online 30 June 2010.

Abstract 

Using latent class analysis (LCA), a previous study on patients attending primary care identified four courses of low back pain (LBP) over the subsequent 6months. To date, no studies have used longitudinal pain recordings to examine the “natural” course of recurrent and chronic LBP in a population-based sample of individuals. This study examines the course of LBP in the general population and elaborates on the stability and criterion-related validity of the clusters derived. A random sample of 400 individuals reporting LBP in a population-based study was asked to complete a comprehensive questionnaire at the start and end of the year’s survey, and 52 weekly pain diaries in between. The latter were analyzed using LCA. 305 individuals returned more than 50% of the diaries. Four clusters were identified (severe persistent, moderate persistent, mild persistent, and fluctuating). The clusters differed significantly with regards to pain and disability. Assessment of cluster stability showed that a considerable proportion of patients in the “fluctuating” group changed their classification over time. Three of the four clusters describing the typical course of pain matched the clusters described previously for patients in primary care. Due to the population-based design, this study achieves, for the first time, a close insight into the “natural” course of chronic and recurrent low back pain, including individuals that did not necessarily visit the general practitioner. The findings will help to understand better the nature of this pain in the general population.

Keywords: Chronic and recurrent low back pain, Natural history, Predictive factors

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0304-3959(10)00322-2

doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.05.019

PAIN
Volume 150, Issue 3 , Pages 451-457, September 2010